tokenpocketapp官方地址|nama

首页
nama

tokenpocketapp官方地址|nama

作者： tokenpocketapp官方地址

2024-03-13 05:47:40

Nama Cold Press Juicer | Nurture Wellness Rituals

Shop

Support

Shop

Guides

Recipes

Journal

About

Support

Account

Juicers

Juicer + Blender

Accessories

Courses

Batch Juicing

Parts

All Products

Search Results:

Product

Pages

Articles

Shop

Guides

Recipes

Journal

About

Support

Account

Juicers

Juicer + Blender

Accessories

Courses

Batch Juicing

Parts

All Products

Search Results:

Product

Pages

Articles

GET TO KNOW OUR NAMA PRODUCTS

Learn More

Why Nama?

Inspire

What inspires you to live well? We love the beauty and simplicity of nature and all the fresh, colorful fruits and vegetables that help enhance your health.

Relax

We want to make it easy and enjoyable for more people to enjoy the benefits of consuming more plants by helping you save time in the kitchen and beyond.

Engage

Community is key when it comes to making sustainable lifestyle changes. We are here for you as you work on nurturing new habits or setting health goals.

Explore Our Products

JUICERS + BLENDERS + ACCESSORIES

JUICERS

MAKE FRESH COLD-PRESSED JUICES AT HOME

Our juicers offer time-saving solutions. Load an entire recipe and step away, creating a hands-free option while you juice.

LEARN MORE

JUICER + BLENDER

THE BEST OF BOTH IN ONEMACHINE

Enjoy even more plant foods with this multi-functional machine that makes both cold-pressed juices, fresh smoothies, and more.

LEARN MORE

ACCESSORIES

ELEVATE YOUR JUICINGEXPERIENCE

Customize your juicing routine with accessories that help you batch juice, strain pulp, and make sorbet.

LEARN MORE

COURSES

ALL ABOUT JUICING ANDBLENDING

In-depth educational courses led by nutritionists to support your juicing and blending journey.

LEARN MORE

Quick Compare

Find the best juicer for you

COMPARE

For Our Community

FIND THE BEST PRODUCT FOR YOU

Recipes

Perfect blends for your seasonal vibrant produce.

Recipes for whatever you have on hand.

Guides

Exclusive guides to all things juicing and blending.

The basics, benefits, and helpful tips all in one place.

Journal

Articles, inspiration, films, and much more.

Timely content for our community to enjoy.

browse

Support

We’re here to help answer your questions.

Explore videos, read FAQs, track order, and talk to a real human.

Get Help

Latest Instagram Posts

Support

Track Order

International

Warranty

Retailers

Careers

About Us

SHOP

ALL OF OUR PRODUCTS

NEWSLETTER

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY

GUIDES

JUICING + BLENDING

RECIPES

DRINK THE RAINBOW

JOURNAL

ARTICLES + COMMUNITY

SUPPORT

HERE TO HELP

VIDEOS

PRODUCTS + INSPIRATION

SHOP

ALL OF OUR PRODUCTS

NEWSLETTER

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY

GUIDES

JUICING + BLENDING

RECIPES

DRINK THE RAINBOW

JOURNAL

ARTICLES + COMMUNITY

SUPPORT

HERE TO HELP

VIDEOS

PRODUCTS + INSPIRATION

Support

Track Order

International

Warranty

Retailers

Careers

About Us

Data Request

Return Policy

Storage Preferences

Do Not Share or Sell My Personal Information

Data Request

Storage Preferences

Do Not Share or Sell My Personal Information

Return Policy

Use left/right arrows to navigate the slideshow or swipe left/right if using a mobile device

Choosing a selection results in a full page refresh.

Press the space key then arrow keys to make a selection.

Your location is set to United States

Set your country for the best international shopping experience.

Learn more.

Continue

Change country/region

We ship to over 200 countries worldwide

Select United States store if your location is not listed.

Continue

Cancel

Just a moment...

a moment...Enable JavaScript and cookies to conti

Nama J2 Cold Press Juicer

Shop

Support

Shop

Guides

Recipes

Journal

About

Support

Account

Juicers

Juicer + Blender

Accessories

Courses

Batch Juicing

Parts

All Products

Search Results:

Product

Pages

Articles

Shop

Guides

Recipes

Journal

About

Support

Account

Juicers

Juicer + Blender

Accessories

Courses

Batch Juicing

Parts

All Products

Search Results:

Product

Pages

Articles

Shop

| Juicers |

Nama J2

Juicers |

Nama J2

Introducing

Nama J2 Cold Press Juicer

A time-saving solution for the next generation of juicing.

SHOP NOW

VIEW PRODUCT OVERVIEW

Juicing Made Easy

Save Time With The Nama J2 Juicer

LESS PREP

HANDS FREE

EASY TO CLEAN

Add whole or large pieces of fruit or veggies into the juicer. Our new hopper technology cuts and loads produce for you, so you no longer need to feed one ingredient at a time.

Load your entire recipe and walk away—you can now multitask in the kitchen. Make one juice or a batch of juices in minutes.

The J2 is designed with specific features for fast and effortless cleaning. Each part only requires a light scrub, soap, and water.

What People are Saying

"It's a Game Changer"

JENNA DAVILA

@livepurejenna

“Load and Walk Away”

JOE CROSS

@joethejuicer

“Next Level Juicing”

KRISTINA CARRILLO-BUCARAM

@fullyrawkristina

Nama J2 Benefits

THE DIFFERENCE IS IN THE DETAILS

A New Way of Juicing

The J2 difference is in the way you juice. With most juicers you feed ingredients one at a time; with the J2 you load once and walk away.

Great Flavor

The auger’s slow pressing speed keeps nutrients intact by minimizing oxidation and heat generation, preserving the natural flavor and nutrients in your juice.

Easy to Clean

Juicing is easy and enjoyable when your juicer is simple to clean. The J2 is designed with specific features for fast and effortless cleaning.

Multi-Functional

The J2 comes with two strainers, allowing you to make much more than juice: smoothies, soups, sauces and plant-based milks.

More Juice

The J2 yields up to 60% more juice from the same amount of ingredients than with traditional high-speed juicers. Save money by getting more juice from your produce.

Family Friendly

The J2 contains safety features so children can juice too. Family time and shared experiences help shape our wellness journey.

Color Options

Available in white, black, or gray. The sleek design offers a fresh, modern look on your counter.

A New Way of Juicing

Great Flavor

Easy to Clean

Multi-Functional

More Juice

Family Friendly

Color Options

A New Way of Juicing

The J2 difference is in the way you juice. With most juicers you feed ingredients one at a time; with the J2 you load once and walk away.

Great Flavor

The auger’s slow pressing speed keeps nutrients intact by minimizing oxidation and heat generation, preserving the natural flavor and nutrients in your juice.

Easy to Clean

Juicing is easy and enjoyable when your juicer is simple to clean. The J2 is designed with specific features for fast and effortless cleaning.

Multi-Functional

The J2 comes with two strainers, allowing you to make much more than juice: smoothies, soups, sauces and plant-based milks.

More Juice

The J2 yields up to 60% more juice from the same amount of ingredients than with traditional high-speed juicers. Save money by getting more juice from your produce.

Family Friendly

The J2 contains safety features so children can juice too. Family time and shared experiences help shape our wellness journey.

Color Options

Available in white, black, or gray. The sleek design offers a fresh, modern look on your counter.

▲

BACK

Nama J2Cold Press Juicer

$550.00 USD

COLOR OPTIONS

WHITE

BLACK

GRAY

Notify me

Add to Cart

Free Domestic Shipping

Estimated to ship in 1-2 business days.

Free Domestic Shipping

15 - Year Warranty

Interest - Free Payments

Why Juice?

Nourish

Our goal is to help more people enjoy the benefits of consuming more plants. Drinking juice can boost your health, reduce cravings, give you more energy and help increase your immunity.

Radiate

Turn your fruits and vegetables into superfoods (vitamins, minerals and phytonutrients) that are easily absorbed by the body. Let your health shine.

Sustain

To keep a habit or a ritual, it has to be simple. Small steps add up. Wellness rituals are those small daily steps to help you maintain a healthy body, a calm mind and more.

Meet the Nama J2

EXPLORE OUR VIDEOS

J2 Product Overview

Almond Milk

Pomegranate Punch

Green Juice

Quick Comparison

SEE OUR JUICERS SIDE BY SIDE

COMPARE

Pulp Strainer

Our new strainer nestles into your juice container on all nama juicer models.

EXPLORE

Sorbet Attachment

Make a delicious dessert at home with the Nama J2 Sorbet Attachment.

EXPLORE

Nama J2Cold Press Juicer

$550.00 USD

COLOR OPTIONS

WHITE

BLACK

GRAY

Notify me

Add to Cart

Free Domestic Shipping

Estimated to ship in 1-2 business days.

Product Details

PRODUCT PARTS INCLUDED

Juicer BasePower Cord (detachable)ChamberHopperHopper LidSpinning BrushAuger Juice ContainerPulp ContainerJuice StrainerSmoothie Strainer Pusher Cleaning BrushRecipe BookUser Manual Quick Start Guide

MATERIALS

Our materials are food safe and BPA-free.Hopper: ABSChamber: Tritan Auger: Ultem Strainer: Stainless steel, UltemBase: ABS

SPECIFICATIONS

Product - Cold Press JuicerModel - J2Model Number - SJ200Rated Voltage - 120 VRated Frequency - 60 HzRated Power Consumption - 200 WRPM - 50 rpmPower Cord Length - 55.1 in (1.4 m)Motor - Single-Phase InductionFuse - 250 V 8AWeight (Chamber Set Included) - 12.1 lbs / 5.5 kgDimensions - W 9.8 in (249 mm) / L 9.0 in (229 mm) / H 17.7 (451 mm)

SHIPPING

Free shipping! We happily offer free domestic ground shipping on all orders within the 48 contiguous US states. Expedited shipping is available to most regions. Hawaii, Alaska, US Territories — We offer our discounted shipping rates through FedEx, UPS and DHL without any mark-up on our end.International ShippingWe have updated our international shipping options so our customers can now shop Nama products with more ease and more affordable shipping rates. The updates include the ability to shop in your local currency with payment plans available (options vary by country), duties and taxes are now reflected in the final sale price, and customers pay the lowest international shipping rates via DHL. We’ve also expedited shipping time to 2-5 business days in most countries. Learn more about international orders.

WARRANTY

Nama warrants to the owner that if the juicer motor base or any of its parts fail within 15 years from the date of purchase due to a defect in material or workmanship or as a result of normal wear and tear from ordinary household use, Nama will repair or replace the failed motor or juicer part at Nama’s sole discretion free of charge. Read More.

RETURN POLICY

We believe you will see the value and feel the benefits of using your Nama Cold Press Juicer every day that we are happy to offer a 30-day satisfaction guarantee trial period. If you are not completely satisfied with your purchase of Nama product(s) from namawell.com, you have 30 days from the date of shipment to return your product for a full refund. Read More.

INTERNATIONAL

Nama J2 is available for Europeon, United Kingdom, and Australian plug types. Shop all Nama international models.

Questions?

WELCOME TO NAMA - NAMA

NAMA

SUBSCRIBEJOIN NAMANAMA FOUNDATIONLOGINTHE NAMA SHOW

MENUVOICEOverviewAction CenterFly-In & Advocacy SummitActive LegislationEconomicResearchKey Issues &CommentsState CouncilsKNOWLEDGEOverviewUpcoming WebcastsArchived WebcastsEconomic Trends TrackerKnowledge CenterThe Essenceof CoffeeOnline ManagementTrainingUnattended Retail Design GuideNETWORKNAMAEvents CalendarFly-In & Advocacy SummitCoffee Tea & WaterThe NAMA ShowIndustry AwardsCONVENIENCE SERVICESOverviewNational Vending DayHistory ofConvenienceServicesInternationalVendingCoffee ServiceMicro MarketsTechnologyEconomicResearchVending, Coffee& FoodServices GuidePublic HealthCommitmentMachine EvaluationFitPick LabelsMEDIAOverviewNAMA TVPress ReleasesInTouchMagazineNewsletterArchivesAdvertise/SponsorMEMBERSHIPOverviewMember LoginJoin NAMARenewMember BenefitsMember SpotlightInTouchMagazineEmerging LeadersNetwork (ELN)Women in theIndustry (WIN)State CouncilsCommitteesFAQsMachine EvaluationABOUTOverviewNAMA FoundationContactNAMA StaffBoard of DirectorsNAMA Board of Directors: Call for NominationsCommitteesAnnual ReportsOur GenerousSponsorsCEO Corner

Bringing convenience to life...

every day, every way and everywhere

LEARN MORE

CONVENIENCE SERVICES

Explore the broad spectrum of the $34.9 billion convenience services industry. Vending, coffee service, micro markets and more.

VOICE

Make your voice heard: NAMA is the universally recognized and influential advocate of the convenience services industry.

UPCOMING EVENTS

The NAMA Show

MAY 7-9, 2024 • DALLAS

KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON CONVENTION CENTER

MORE EVENTS

NETWORK

Build relationships with your industry peers: NAMA is a dynamic, growth-oriented, and essential business forum.

KNOWLEDGE

Elevate your business and accelerate your career: NAMA is the premier knowledge source for industry members.

PRESS RELEASES

Annual Convenience Services Industry Revenue Reaches $26.6 Billion, Matching Pre-Pandemic Level

March 12, 2024

NAMA Announces Release of VDI 2.0 Technical Standard

March 5, 2024

MORE NEWS

MEMBERSHIP

NAMA promotes and protects the advancement of the convenience services industry.

Founded in 1936, NAMA is the association representing the $34.9 billion US convenience services industry. With nearly 1,000 member companies — including many of the world’s most recognized brands — NAMA provides advocacy, education and research for its membership.

DOWNLOAD FLYER

AboutCode of Conduct / EthicsPrivacy PolicyContactSubscribe Today

1777 North Kent Street, Suite 1010, Arlington, VA 22209

571.349.0149

Scroll To Top

Nama people - Wikipedia

Jump to content

Main menu

move to sidebar

hide

Navigation

Main pageContentsCurrent eventsRandom articleAbout WikipediaContact usDonate

Contribute

HelpLearn to editCommunity portalRecent changesUpload file

Create account

Personal tools

Create account Log in

Pages for logged out editors learn more

ContributionsTalk

Contents

move to sidebar

hide

(Top)

1History

Toggle History subsection

1.1Nama People partial ancestry from Khoikhoi People at the Cape Colony (South Africa)

1.2Nama People at German South West Africa Colony (Namibia)

1.2.1Conflicts between Nama people and Herero people

1.2.2Nama-German Conflicts

1.2.3Nama-Herero Genocide 1904-1908

2Clans

3Culture

Toggle Culture subsection

3.1Dress

3.2Habitation

3.3Settlements

3.4Religion

3.5Burials

3.6Wedding ritual

4See also

5References

6Literature

7External links

Toggle the table of contents

Nama people

29 languages

AfrikaansالعربيةБеларускаяCatalàDeutschEestiEspañolEsperantoEuskaraFrançaisGalego한국어हिन्दीHrvatskiBahasa IndonesiaItalianoქართულიLietuviųمصرىNederlandsNedersaksies日本語PortuguêsRomânăРусскийSlovenščinaSuomiSvenskaУкраїнська

Edit links

ArticleTalk

English

ReadEditView history

Tools

move to sidebar

hide

Actions

ReadEditView history

General

What links hereRelated changesUpload fileSpecial pagesPermanent linkPage informationCite this pageGet shortened URLDownload QR codeWikidata item

Print/export

Download as PDFPrintable version

In other projects

Wikimedia Commons

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ethnic group in Southern Africa

This article includes a list of general references, but it lacks sufficient corresponding inline citations. Please help to improve this article by introducing more precise citations. (July 2018) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)

Nama NamaquaA Nama man of Namibia.Regions with significant populations Namibia Botswana South Africa Namibia130,349LanguagesNama, Namibian Black German (rare)ReligionChristianity, African Traditional Religion, IslamRelated ethnic groupsKhoekhoe

This article contains click symbols from the Khoekhoe language. Without proper rendering support, you may see question marks, boxes, or other symbols.

A Nama man

Nama (in older sources also called Namaqua) are an African ethnic group of South Africa, Namibia and Botswana. They traditionally speak the Nama language of the Khoe-Kwadi language family, although many Nama also speak Afrikaans. The Nama People (or Nama-Khoe people) are the largest group of the Khoikhoi people, most of whom have disappeared as a group, except for the Namas. Many of the Nama clans live in Central Namibia and the other smaller groups live in Namaqualand, which today straddles the Namibian border with South Africa.[1]

History[edit]

Nama group in front of a hut

Chief Hendrik Witbooi (centre) and his companionsFor thousands of years, the Khoisan peoples of South Africa and southern Namibia maintained a nomadic life, the Khoikhoi as pastoralists and the San people as hunter-gatherers. The Nama are a Khoikhoi group. The Nama originally lived around the Orange River in southern Namibia and northern South Africa. The early colonialists referred to them as Hottentots. Their alternative historical name, "Namaqua", stems from the addition of the Khoekhoe language suffix "-qua/kwa", meaning "place of" (found in the names of other Southern African nations like the Griqua), to the language name.

Nama People partial ancestry from Khoikhoi People at the Cape Colony (South Africa)[edit]

In April 1652, Jan van Riebeeck, an official of the Dutch East India Company, arrived at the Cape of Good Hope with 90 people to start initial Dutch settlement at the request of the company. They found the indigenous settlers called the Khoikhoi there, who had settled in the Cape region at least a thousand years before the Dutch arrived.[2][3]

The Khoikhoi at the Cape practiced pastoral farming; they were the first pastoralists in Southern Africa. They lived beside the San people, who were hunter-gathers. The Khoikhoi had a lot of Nguni cattle and small livestock which they grazed around the Cape. The region was well suited to their lives as pastoralists because it provided enough water for them and their livestock.[3]

Initially, when the Dutch made a stop at the Cape on the way to the Indonesian archipelago, they were concerned with getting fresh produce and water for their people. Indonesia was rich in crops and spices which could not be produced in Europe, which is why the Dutch had major interest there. The Dutch had enslaved a large number of Indonesians to work on their plantations.[3] In the Cape, Van Riebeek initially attempted to get cattle, land, and labour from the Khoikhoi people through negotiation, but when these negotiations failed, conflicts began to occur. The Dutch settlers waged wars against the Khoikoi, and seized their lands to construct farms for wheat and other produce, and forced many Khoikoi people to work as labourers. Their livestock was also taken and they were denied access to grazing and water resources unless they worked for the Dutch settlers.[4]

During the 18th and 19th centuries, as conflicts intensified and Dutch settlement was expanding and taking up much space in the colony, the expansion of the colony frontier pushed the Khoikhoi Eastwards into the easternmost Cape & the eventual "closed frontier" native reserves (Transkei &Ciskei) and Northwards across the so-called "open frontier" (Northern Cape & South West Africa/Namibia).[5] Some descendants of Khoikhoi communities, including the Nama, fled north of the colony and crossed the Orange River into German South West Africa (present day Namibia).[6]

In 1991, a part of Namaqualand (home of the Nama and one of the last true wilderness areas of South Africa) was named the Richtersveld National Park. In December 2002, ancestral lands, including the park, were returned to community ownership and the governments of South Africa and Namibia began creating a trans-frontier park from the west coast of southern Africa to the desert interior, absorbing the Richtersveld National Park. Today, the Richtersveld National Park is one of the few places where the original Nama traditions survive. There, the Nama move with the seasons and speak their language. The traditional Nama dwelling – the |haru oms, or portable rush-mat covered domed hut – protects against the blistering sun, and is easy to move when grazing becomes scarce.

Nama People at German South West Africa Colony (Namibia)[edit]

Some Khoikhoi groups including the Nama under the leadership of David Witbooi (Hendrik Witbooi's grandfather) had crossed the Orange River into South West Africa. David Witbooi was the first Khoikhoi leader to establish a permanent Namaqua settlement north Orange River beginning in the mid-1840s. In 1863, he eventually led his people to Gibeon (south-central Namibia) where he developed a communialist society centered on cattle, trade and Christianity. After his death in 1875 Moses Witbooi (Hendrik Witbooi's father) assumed chieftaincy and remained in that position until 1883. Like his father Moses followed Christian practices and worked closely with Johannes Olpp, a Protestant missionary affiliated with Rheinische Missionsgesellschaft (Rhenish Mission Society, RMG) who arrived in Gibeon in 1868. Moses supported Olpp's efforts to build a church and mission station, and also helped found an RMG school in the settlement.[7]

Conflicts between Nama people and Herero people[edit]

In June 1884 Hendrik Witbooi had taken over leadership from his father, and in that year he began the first of his several treks with his people north into central Damaraland in search of new settlement. He had just resigned from his position in church as an elder a year before (1883), he styled himself as a biblical prophet and gained support of the most prominent families in Gibeon. Witbooi established a settlement in Hoornkrans the very same year he moved from Gibeon. Hoornkrans was an important stronghold territory controlled by the Herero, powerful Bantu pastoralists community led by Chief Maharero. Witbooi's decision to expand his influence into Hoornkrans sparked a protracted military conflict between the two tribes. However, a few months before the conflict began, Maharero had finalized a protection agreement with officials from the newly arrived German colonial administration. Although he knew about Maharero's treaty with Germany, Witbooi never waivered in his decision to confront the Herero people. Witbooi was campaigning for his tribe's supremacy in the colony and he continued to clash with other tribal communities that were under the auspices of the German protection. These rivalries between the Nama people and other tribes posed a significant problem for the imperial government because the Germans' mandate for the colony was gradually being weakened. German leaders therefore sought to bring immediate end to the conflicts between Herero people and Witbooi Namaqua.[7]

Nama-German Conflicts[edit]

In June 1886, Reichskomissar Göring wrote Witbooi, encouraging him to end his hostile actions in the colony. He pleaded with the Nama Chief to return home to Gibeon to be with his father and tribe and live in peace there; he warned that the German government could not allow chieftains who have placed themselves under German protection to support his ambition of driving a protected chiefdom into war. Witbooi and his people ignored this warning and continued his campaign for dominance against the Herero. Later that same year Louis Nels, a deputy officer to Göering wrote to Witbooi inviting him to participate in a conciliatory meeting between the various warring communities in Walvis Bay. With this meeting German authorities had hoped to facilitate a peace treaty, however the Namaqua chief did not comply with the request but instead he wrote a letter in response telling Nels that he will not listen to him. He made it known to Nels that he (Witbooi) is a chief of his tribe who is free and an autonomous man who answers only to God. The German officials did not respond to Witbooi's diplomatic reproach. With the limits of German on full display, imperial officials were at a loss about how to end the violence in GSWA.[7]

In June 1888, Göring wrote Chancellor Otto Von Bismarck and described the overall situation as "not very encouraging". April 1889 Göring went so far as to threaten open war against Witbooi and his tribe if he did not halt his attacks against groups allied with Germany. Witbooi's resistance prompted policy makers to seek immediate solutions to the instability in GSWA. The Namaqua resistance provoked the German authorities to act decisively, after 1889 Germany's military presence in the colony began to grow exponentially. In March 1893 Chancellor Von Caprivi proclaimed GSWA a German settlement colony. November same year Kaiser Wilhelm II appointed Curt von François as Landeshauptmann. A fanatic, François looked at Witbooi with disdain and called him a mere "tribesman" whom he could defeat easily. He had a notion that his predecessors acted weakly in dealing with the Nama chief and they made too many concessions. François strongly believed that nothing but relentless severity would end Witbooi's resistance decisively. Initially the German official tried to entice with an annual payment of five thousand marks if he would submit, however the Nama chief maintained his stand.[7][8]

François was pressured by the Colonial Society to take action against Witbooi, subsequently on April 12, 1893, he launched a surprise attack on Witbooi and his tribe at Hoornkrans. 214 soldiers had been sent with an ultimate objective to "destroy the Witbooi Nama tribe". Though Witbooi and majority of his male soldiers escaped the encirclement, German troops killed nearly one hundred Namaqua women and children in their sleep. The Namaqua were unprepared for the raid believing François was still committed to neutrality. Previously Hendrik had scrupulously avoided harming Germans, but now was compelled to join the colonizers in war. In a series of running skirmishes that lasted for more than a year the Namaqua had great success, stealing horses and livestock from the German headquarters in Windhoek. At the end of 1893 Theodor Leutwein replaced Von François, he was appointed to the colony to investigate the reasons for continuing failure to subdue the Nama people . In July 1894 Leutwein asked for 250 troops, with the enlarged army he was able to defeat the Nama people who at the time had run out of ammunition; the English at the Cape and Walvis Bay had refused them assistance. Leiutwein successfully subdued the Nama and forced Hendrik to sign a protection treaty .[7][8]

Nama-Herero Genocide 1904-1908[edit]

Main article: Herero and Namaqua genocide

June 1904 Kaiser Wilhelm replaced Leutwein with Lieutenant General Lothar von Trotha; like his predecessor, von Trotha believed that violence would ultimately put an end to the wars in the colony. He employed a policy of extermination of the whole African tribes in the colony.[citation needed]

Prisoners during the Herero and Namaqua genocide

The Nama people are fighters in pre-colonial times, the Namas and the Herero people fought for control of pastures in central Namibia. The battle continued for a long part of the 19th century.[9]

From 1904 to 1908, the German Empire, which had colonized present-day Namibia, waged a war against the Nama and the Herero (a group of Bantu pastoralists), leading to the Herero and Namaqua genocide and a large loss of life for both the Nama and Herero populations.[10] This was motivated by the German desire to establish a prosperous colony which required displacing the indigenous people from their agricultural land.[11][12] Large herds of cattle were confiscated and Nama and Herero people were driven into the desert and in some cases interned in concentration camps on the coast,[13][14] for example at Shark Island. Additionally, the Nama and Herero were forced into slave labor to build railways and to dig for diamonds during the diamond rush.[15]

In the 1920s diamonds were discovered at the mouth of the Orange River, and prospectors began moving there, establishing towns at Alexander Bay and Port Nolloth. This accelerated the appropriation of traditional lands that had begun early in the colonial period.[citation needed] Under apartheid, remaining pastoralists were encouraged to abandon their traditional lifestyle in favour of village life.[citation needed]

At the dawn of the 19th century, Oorlam people encroached into Namaqualand and Damaraland. They likewise descended from indigenous Khoikhoi but were a group with mixed ancestry including Europeans and slaves from Madagascar, India, and Indonesia.[16] After two centuries of assimilation into the Nama culture, many Oorlams today regard Khoikhoigowab (Damara/Nama) as their mother tongue, though others speak Afrikaans. The distinction between Namas and Oorlams has gradually disappeared over time to an extent where they are today regarded as one ethnic group, despite their different ancestries.[17]

Clans[edit]

ǀKhowesen (Direct descendants of Captain Hendrik Witbooi) who was killed in the battle with Germans on 29 October 1905.[18] The |Khowesin, reside in modern-day Gibeon under the leadership of Ismael Hendrik Witbooi the 9th Gaob (meaning captain) of the |Khowesen Gibeon, situated 72 km south of Mariental and 176 km north of Keetmanshoop just off the B1, was originally known by the name Khaxa-tsûs. It received its name from Kido Witbooi first Kaptein of the ǀKhowesin.

Khaiǁkhaun (Red Nation) at Hoachanas, the main group and the oldest Nama clan in Namibia[19]

ǃGamiǂnun (Bondelswarts) at Warmbad

ǂAonin (Topnaars) at Utuseb and Rooibank

ǃKharakhoen (Fransman Nama) at Gochas. After being defeated by Imperial Germany's Schutztruppe in the Battle of Swartfontein on 15 January 1905, this Nama group split into two. Part of the ǃKharakhoen fled to Lokgwabe, Botswana, and stayed there permanently,[20] the part that remained on South West African soil relocated their tribal centre to Amper-Bo. In 2016 David Hanse was inaugurated as chief of the clan.[21]

ǁHawoben (Veldschoendragers) at Koës

!Aman at Bethanie which was led by Cornelius Frederick

ǁOgain (Groot Doden) at Schlip

ǁKhauǀgoan (Swartbooi Nama) at Rehoboth, later at Salem, Ameib, and Franzfontein

The Kharoǃoan (Keetmanshoop Nama) under the leadership of Hendrik Tseib[22] split from the Red Nation in February 1850 and settled at Keetmanshoop.[19]

Culture[edit]

Haru oms huts.

In general, the Nama practice a policy of communal land ownership. Music, poetry and story telling are very important in Nama culture and many stories have been passed down orally through the generations.

The Nama have a culture that is rich in the musical and literary abilities of its people. Traditional music, folk tales, proverbs, and praise poetry have been handed down for generations and form the base for much of their culture. They are known for crafts which include leatherwork, skin karosses and mats, musical instruments (such as reed flutes), jewellery, clay pots, and tortoiseshell powder containers.

Many of the Nama people in South Namibia have lost their lands during German colonialism. New Namibian minister of land reform, Uutoni Nujoma has been accused of preferring other Namibians from other regions over native Namas.[23]

Dress[edit]

The traditional dress of Nama women consists of long, formal dresses that resemble Victorian traditional fashion. The long, flowing dresses were developed from the style of the missionaries in the 1800s, and this traditional clothing is today an integral part of the Nama nation's culture.

Habitation[edit]

The Nama people's hut, also called matjieshuis, is a round hut traditionally made of beautifully designed reed mats on a skeleton of sticks. It corresponds to their nomadic life of the past; matjieshuis is still part of the life of the inhabitants of Richtersveld– a region made up of mountainous deserts in the northwest of South Africa. In fact, this is the last place where we can still find them in significant numbers. In the villages currently in the Richtersveld, the matjieshuis are used as a depot to store, as a kitchen, as an additional place to sleep, or even to provide to tourists, like accommodation.

These huts, called haru oms in the Nama language, are made of reed mats woven neatly into a beehive shape. It is a dwelling house for all seasons– it is cool and well ventilated in summer, it is naturally insulated by reed carpets in winter, and protected from the rain by the porous stems which swell with water. All materials are organic and not over-harvested; this is a home that truly respects the environment. Women and men take part in the making of it, in the collection of materials, in the preparation of the rugs, and in the assembly of the hut, in a very meticulous process which has remained a true Nama art.[24]

Settlements[edit]

Traditionally, Nama camps had 5-30 huts. These huts were circular domes and their doors faced the center of camp. They were also arranged hierarchically; the chief's was placed west and faced east. Other families were placed based on their seniority. Elder brothers and their families were on the far right, while younger brothers and their families on the left.[25] There are no enclosures for adult livestock. They are expected to sleep in front of their owners huts. Calves and lambs are placed in an enclosed area in the middle of camp. The huts were lined with reed mats made by women,[26] and the mats are placed on wooden frames. The reeds are able to soak and absorb water well, thus being able to protect the Nama people from summer rain. These Huts are very mobile, but also stable, being able to break them down in less than an hour. The huts are also reusable.

Religion[edit]

They have largely abandoned their traditional religion through the sustained efforts of Christian (and now Muslim) missionaries. The majority of the Nama people in Namibia today are therefore Christian while Nama Muslims make up a large percentage of Namibia's Muslims.[27]

Burials[edit]

In the past funerals were not a big social gathering. The Nama people simply buried the body and never spoke about the person again due to fear of spirits. Today funerals are social solidarity. The position of the person in the community being buried matters– that determines the burial site. Members of close relatives of the deceased

person spend a week preparing the grave site, digging, and using flattened oil drums as sheets. The mourning takes place three days before the actual burial. During the first two nights of the mourning, there is singing of hymns, preaching, and praying. On the last day of the mourning and the day of the burial, there are speeches presented and messages of condolences.[28] The grave site itself is lined with brick, and once the body is inside, a wooden board is laid upon the top before it is covered with dirt. This style of the burial site makes it easy for preservation of the body.

Wedding ritual[edit]

A house in Windhoek's Hochland Park suburb. The white flag indicates marriage arrangements are in place.

Namas have a complicated wedding ritual. First, the man has to discuss his intentions with his family. If they agree they will advise him of the customs to ask the bride's family and then accompany him to the place she lives. The yard at the bride's living place is prepared prior to the future husband's family's arrival; animal hides are laid out in the corners for the different groups to sit down and discuss.[29]

The groom's family will ask for the gate to be opened. If this is granted, the groom is interrogated about details of the bride, including the circumstances of their first meeting and how to identify her body marks to make sure both know each other well. If the bride is pregnant or already has children from her future husband or someone else, the bride is subjected to the "door cleansing" ceremony (slaughtering and consuming a snow-white goat). After several days the wedding ritual continues in reverse; the bride's family visits the clan of the groom. If all is to the satisfaction of the two clans, an engagement day is announced.[29]

At the engagement, the groom's family brings live animals to the woman's family home. The animals are slaughtered, hung on three sticks, and each part is offered to the bride's family. Other items like bags of sugar or flour are only offered in quantities of two or four to indicate that there will always be abundance of food. This process is also celebrated in reverse at the man's family home. White flags are mounted on both families' houses which may not be taken off but wither or are blown off by the wind one day.[29]

The wedding preparations can take up to a year. The family of the groom makes a gift to the bride's mother, traditionally a cow and a calf, for she has raised the bride at her breast. A bargaining process accompanies the gift that can take weeks in itself. On wedding day, both families provide animals and other food and bring it to the bride's home. The wedding itself takes place in a church. Festivities afterward go on for several days. The first night after the wedding the couple spends separately. On the next morning, they set off for their own home.[29]

WTO | Market access - Non-agricultural market access negotiations - A simple guide

WTO | Market access - Non-agricultural market access negotiations - A

simple guide

WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION

español

françaishometrade topicsmarket

accessnegotiationssimple guide

MARKET ACCESS:

NEGOTIATIONS

A simple guide — NAMA

Negotiations

> NAMA negotiations main page

What are NAMA products?

NAMA refers to all products not

covered by the Agreement on Agriculture. In other words, in practice, it

includes manufacturing products, fuels and mining products, fish and fish

products, and forestry products. They are sometimes referred to as

industrial products or manufactured goods.

Why is NAMA so important?

Over the past years, NAMA products

have accounted for almost 90% of the world merchandise exports.

What did the Uruguay Round

achieve on tariffs for NAMA products?

The Uruguay Round produced

significant improvements in market access for NAMA products in the

developed country markets, as tariff averages were reduced from 6.3% to

3.8%. In the case of developing countries, the most important contribution

was made in the form of new tariff bindings. Binding coverage for NAMA

products in developing countries increased from 21% to 73%, which has

considerably increased the predictability of trade.

What do tariff bindings mean and how do they work?

A tariff binding is a ceiling level

above which a Member cannot apply a tariff. In other words, it is the

maximum tariff that may be applied by a Member. However, such rates are

not cast in stone. They may be increased or withdrawn subject to

compensation being provided to the WTO Members affected by such action.

The applied tariff is the tariff

effectively applied. It can be lower than the bound rate and the

difference has been called “water” or the “binding overhang”.

Why are there NAMA negotiations in the DDA?

Despite the significant

improvements in market access for NAMA products that previous GATT rounds

and the Uruguay Round produced, tariffs continue to be an important

barrier to world trade, as tariff peaks, high tariffs, and tariff

escalation remain.

How were tariffs cut in the previous Rounds?

In the first GATT rounds, tariffs

were cut on a selective product-by-product basis through requests and

offers made between participants. However, subsequently contracting

parties decided to use formulas to cut tariffs across-the-board. For

example, during the Kennedy Round (linear cut formula) and in the Tokyo

Round (Swiss formula) developed countries applied formulas, but with

several exceptions. In the Uruguay Round developing and developed

participants negotiated their tariff cuts using a variety of methods to

reach a reduction average target comparable to that of the Tokyo Round

(1/3 cut).

Why has a formula approach been agreed to in the NAMA negotiations?

Following intensive discussions, participants recognized the advantages of

the formula approach. A formula approach provides transparency (every

Member will know how the other will reduce its tariffs); efficiency

(simpler process than request/offer approach), equity (tariff reduction

depends on rules rather then “bargaining power”); predictability (easy to

foresee the results of the negotiations).

How will flexibilities will be applied to developing countries and LDCs?

Flexibility provisions for

developing countries: According to the July 2004 Framework, developing

countries would enjoy longer implementation periods for their tariff

reductions; and choose between : 1) less than formula cuts for up to [10%]

of their tariff lines representing up to [10%] of their import value; or

2) not apply formula cuts, or leave unbound tariff lines, for up to [5%]

of their tariff lines representing up to [5%] of their import value.

Least Developed Countries: The least-developed country participants are

not required to apply the formula or participate in the sectorial

approach, their contribution being to substantially increase their binding

coverage at levels in accordance with their needs and development.

Other S & D treatment: developing countries with a binding coverage of

less than [35%] would be exempt from formula reductions, but instead would

contribute by binding their tariffs at an average level that does not

exceed the overall average of the post-Uruguay Round bound tariffs for all

developing countries.

Newly Acceded members: These members will also be provided with special

tariff reduction provisions.

What is a non-tariff barrier?

There is no official definition but, in general terms, it refers to any

measure other than a tariff which protects domestic industry. Many

non-tariff measures are based on a legitimate goal (such as the protection

of human health) and can be introduced in a WTO consistent manner.

Agreements such as the SPS and TBT aim at allowing governments to take due

care of these legitimate goals while minimizing the impact on trade and

avoiding the temptation to use them as disguised protectionism.

How are NTBs being addressed in the NAMA negotiations?

The negotiating group has been identifying, categorizing and examining the

various NTBs. Many NTBs are being resolved bilaterally, others are being

addressed on a sectoral basis. Some are also part of other existing

multilateral NTB Agreements. Results on NTBs are also expected from other

Negotiating Groups such as Trade Facilitation. NTB outcomes will have

multilateral effect and therefore benefit all Members.

How will the Doha NAMA result improve the market access conditions for

products of export interest to developing countries?

Important to note that developing Members have a diverse export base. As a

result of the formula, tariff peaks, high tariffs and tariff escalation

will diminish or disappear altogether. Consequently, market access

opportunities will open up both in the markets of developed Members, but

also of other developing Members. Such access will be further improved

through the sectorial initiatives which will be implemented on an MFN

basis by those Members joining such initiatives. Addressing NTBs in this

Round is also expected to improve the access into the markets of Members.

Market access for LDC products has improved and is expected to improve

both into developed as well as developing country markets. In this regard,

the Doha mandate calls on developed Members as well as others in a

position to do so to grant duty free and quota free access to LDC products

on a date to be determined. Additionally, through increased binding

coverage and reduction of the binding overhang, market access conditions

will be made more secure.

NAMA FOUNDATION - NAMA

NAMA

SUBSCRIBEJOIN NAMANAMA FOUNDATIONLOGINTHE NAMA SHOW

NAMA FOUNDATION

Your future, our focus.

OverviewAboutDonateAnnual ReportsStrategic PartnersSupportersPlanned GivingIndustry Census Report

Donate

Your donations directly support our mission to strengthen and advance the industry.

Annual Reports

Read firsthand how your generous support helps us position the industry for growth.

Industry Census

Download or purchase the most recent metrics and report on the industry.

Strategic Partners

Thank you to our member companies that made commitments to NAMA and the NAMA Foundation Strategic Partners program.

Supporters

Thank you to our Annual Fund contributors, supporting key programs and initiatives that advance the needs of the industry.

Planned Giving

Leaving a legacy: Explore the many different ways you can plan now, and give later, through the estate planning process.

Our Mission

To advance strategic support of voice, knowledge and research in the convenience services industry.

The Foundation of the National Automatic Merchandising Association (NAMA Foundation) is a 501(c)3 charitable organization (EIN #36-3169508). All contributions to the NAMA Foundation are tax deductible to the fullest extent of the law. Please consult your tax advisor for more information. Contact the NAMA Foundation today!

AboutCode of Conduct / EthicsPrivacy PolicyContactSubscribe Today

1777 North Kent Street, Suite 1010, Arlington, VA 22209

571.349.0149

Scroll To Top

Shop Nama Cold Press Juicer Models

Shop

Support

Shop

Guides

Recipes

Journal

About

Support

Account

Juicers

Juicer + Blender

Accessories

Courses

Batch Juicing

Parts

All Products

Search Results:

Product

Pages

Articles

Shop

Guides

Recipes

Journal

About

Support

Account

Juicers

Juicer + Blender

Accessories

Courses

Batch Juicing

Parts

All Products

Search Results:

Product

Pages

Articles

Shop

Juicers

Shop

Juicers

Juicing Made Easy

NURTURE WELLNESS RITUALS

Our Juicers:

North America Models

International Models

Accessories

Juicer Parts

Juicers

North America Models

COLD PRESS JUICER

$550

Color Options:

White

Black

Gray

$550

COLD PRESS JUICER

$399

Color Options:

White

Black

Silver

$399

Juicers

International Models

Select your Country

No matching result

Need more help?

International Models

Juicers

Nama Juicer Parts

Vitality 5800 | J1

Support

Track Order

International

Warranty

Retailers

Careers

About Us

SHOP

ALL OF OUR PRODUCTS

NEWSLETTER

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY

GUIDES

JUICING + BLENDING

RECIPES

DRINK THE RAINBOW

JOURNAL

ARTICLES + COMMUNITY

SUPPORT

HERE TO HELP

VIDEOS

PRODUCTS + INSPIRATION

SHOP

ALL OF OUR PRODUCTS

NEWSLETTER

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY

GUIDES

JUICING + BLENDING

RECIPES

DRINK THE RAINBOW

JOURNAL

ARTICLES + COMMUNITY

SUPPORT

HERE TO HELP

VIDEOS

PRODUCTS + INSPIRATION

Support

Track Order

International

Warranty

Retailers

Careers

About Us

Data Request

Return Policy

Storage Preferences

Do Not Share or Sell My Personal Information

Data Request

Storage Preferences

Do Not Share or Sell My Personal Information

Return Policy

Use left/right arrows to navigate the slideshow or swipe left/right if using a mobile device

Choosing a selection results in a full page refresh.

Press the space key then arrow keys to make a selection.

Your location is set to United States

Set your country for the best international shopping experience.

Learn more.

Continue

Change country/region

We ship to over 200 countries worldwide

Select United States store if your location is not listed.

Continue

Cancel

National Asset Management Agency - Wikipedia

Jump to content

Main menu

move to sidebar

hide

Navigation

Main pageContentsCurrent eventsRandom articleAbout WikipediaContact usDonate

Contribute

HelpLearn to editCommunity portalRecent changesUpload file

Create account

Personal tools

Create account Log in

Pages for logged out editors learn more

ContributionsTalk

Contents

move to sidebar

hide

(Top)

1Background

2NAMA's operations

3Master Special Purpose Vehicle

4NAMA's private investors

Toggle NAMA's private investors subsection

4.1Sale of AIB and Irish Life Investment Managers' stakes

5Timetable

6Defining "long-term economic value"

7Academic and political criticism

8Supplementary Data and Draft Business Plan

Toggle Supplementary Data and Draft Business Plan subsection

8.1Market response

8.2Analysis of the data

8.3Transfer of derivatives portfolio to NAMA

8.4Post transfer

8.5Raising new equity capital

8.6Capital from a debt-for-equity swap

8.7The Draft Business Plan

9Risk-sharing v ex post levy

10Operations in 2010-11

11Recent developments

Toggle Recent developments subsection

11.1Status as a public authority

11.2Geoghegan Review

11.3NAMA to Nature

11.4Northern Ireland loan sale

11.5"Project Albion" portfolio sale

11.6Section 110 tax avoidance

11.7Garrett Kelleher Litigation

12See also

13References

14External links

Toggle the table of contents

National Asset Management Agency

4 languages

FrançaisGaeilgeNederlandsSvenska

Edit links

ArticleTalk

English

ReadEditView history

Tools

move to sidebar

hide

Actions

ReadEditView history

General

What links hereRelated changesUpload fileSpecial pagesPermanent linkPage informationCite this pageGet shortened URLDownload QR codeWikidata item

Print/export

Download as PDFPrintable version

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

State agency in Ireland

National AssetManagement AgencyState Agency of the National Treasury Management Agency overviewFormed21 December 2009JurisdictionIrelandHeadquartersTreasury Dock, North Wall Quay, DublinEmployees200Annual budget€240 million estimated cost per annumState Agency of the National Treasury Management Agency executiveBrendan McDonagh, Chief ExecutiveKey documentNational Asset Management Agency Act, 2009Websitewww.nama.ie

The National Asset Management Agency (NAMA; Irish: Gníomhaireacht Náisiúnta um Bhainistíocht Sócmhainní) is a body created by the government of Ireland in late 2009 in response to the Irish financial crisis and the deflation of the Irish property bubble.

NAMA functions as a bad bank, acquiring property development loans from Irish banks in return for government purple debts bonds, ostensibly with a view to improving the availability of credit in the Irish economy. The original book value of these loans was €77 billion (comprising €68bn for the original loans and €9bn rolled up interest), and the original asset values to which the loans related was €88bn, with there being an average Loan To Value of 77% and the current market value is estimated at €47 billion.[1][2]

NAMA is controversial, with politicians (who were in opposition at the time of its formation)[3]

and some economists criticising the approach,[4] including Nobel Prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz who has said that the Irish government is "squandering" public money with its plan to bail out the banks.[5][6]

One year after NAMA's establishment, the Irish government was compelled for other but similar reasons to seek a European Union-International Monetary Fund bailout in November 2010, the outcome of which will have considerable effects on NAMA's future operations.

Despite this early criticism, as of year end 2018, NAMA had recovered €37.4bn from its owned assets and projected that it would eventually generate a net surplus of €4bn.[7] And as of September 2021, NAMA had delivered a total surplus of €2.75bn to the Department of Finance, and projected that its final net surplus would be €4.65bn.[8]

Background[edit]

As a result of the collapse of the Irish property market, Irish banks have property development loan assets secured on property with a market value significantly below the amount owed. Many loans are now non-performing due to debtors experiencing acute financial difficulties. Both factors have led to a sharp drop in the value of these loan assets.

If the banks were to recognise the true value of these loans on their balance sheets, they would no longer meet their statutory capital requirements. The banks, therefore, need to raise further capital; however, given the uncertainty around the true value of their assets, their stock is in too little demand for a general share issuance to be a viable option.[9]

The banks are also suffering a liquidity crisis due, in part, to their lack of suitable collateral for European Central Bank repo loans. Along with their capital requirement problems, this is limiting the banks' ability to offer credit to their customers and, in turn, contributing to the lack of growth in the Irish economy.[10]

NAMA's operations[edit]

The National Asset Management Agency Bill, in its current format, applies to the six financial institutions which were covered by the Irish government's deposit guarantee scheme. Those institutions were Bank of Ireland, Allied Irish Banks, Anglo Irish Bank, EBS, Permanent TSB and Irish Nationwide. Other institutions, such as Ulster Bank, which are not covered, had the option to join the scheme.[11] Ulster Bank eventually decided not to do so;[12] its parent company Royal Bank of Scotland having joined the analogous UK scheme earlier in 2009.[13]

Then-Minister for Finance, Brian Lenihan said the banks would have to assume significant losses when the loans, largely made to property developers, are removed from their books. If such losses resulted in the banks needing more capital, then the government would insist on taking an equity stake in the lenders.[14] Economist Peter Bacon, who was appointed by the government to advise on solutions to the banking crisis, said the new agency had potential to bring a better economic solution to the banking crisis and was preferable to nationalising the banks.[15]

The assets were to be purchased by using government bonds, which led to a significant increase in Ireland's gross national debt.[14]

The Bill provided for NAMA to be established on a statutory basis as a separate body corporate with its own Board appointed by the Minister for Finance and with management services provided by the National Treasury Management Agency.[16]

[17]

The Bill envisaged that NAMA would arrange and supervise the identification and valuation of property-backed loans on the books of qualifying financial institutions in Ireland, but would delegate the purchase and management of these loans to a separately created Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV).[18]

Master Special Purpose Vehicle[edit]

NAMA SPV structure

In a letter from the Central Statistics Office of Ireland (CSO) to Eurostat, dated 22 September 2009,[19] details are provided on the suggested creation by NAMA of a Master Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) known as National Asset Management Ltd and controlled by the holding company National Asset Management Agency Investment Ltd. The CSO sought guidance from Eurostat on how NAMA and the SPV would be classified in national accounts.

NAMA arranged and supervised the identification and valuation of property-backed loans on the books of qualifying financial institutions in Ireland, but the purchase and management of these loans were the responsibility of the SPV. The SPV has a majority of private equity. It funds the purchase of the loan books from financial institutions by issuing securities, most of which are backed by a guarantee from the Irish Government.

According to the details provided to Eurostat, the Master SPV is a separate legal entity and is jointly owned by private investors, who would own 51% of its equity and therefore have the majority vote, and by NAMA, which would hold the remaining 49%. The subscribed capital of the Master SPV would be €100m. Although the SPV has its own Board, NAMA retains a veto over all decisions of the Board that could affect the interests of NAMA or of the Irish government. The Master SPV is run with the objective of making a profit on the purchase and management of the assets it purchases.

The private investors in the Master SPV are entitled to the following economic return: the equity investors will receive an annual dividend linked to the performance of the Master SPV; On winding up of the Master SPV, the equity investors would only be repaid their capital if the Master SPV has the resources; they would receive a further equity bonus of 10% of the capital if the Master SPV makes a profit; All other profits and gains of the Master SPV would accrue to NAMA.

Former Finance Minister, the late Brian Lenihan believed that pension funds could be the most appropriate investors in the SPV.[20] The annual dividend, should one be paid, is to be capped at the 10-year Irish Government bond yield at the time the dividend is declared.[21] Lenihan said he was confident that the €51m could be found from suitable investors because of the similarity of the SPV investment to a government bond.

In its analysis, the Central Statistics Office (CSO) requested that NAMA be classified as a Government Entity and the Master SPV as a Financial Institution; the likely impact of this classification could be that the debt issued by the SPV, guaranteed by the Irish government, would not be classified as part of the national debt of Ireland by Eurostat.

In a letter dated 16 October 2009, Eurostat gave a preliminary view.[22] The letter stated that NAMA is to be treated as part of the government sector, the type of assets to be purchased cannot be expanded without the approval of the European Commission, that it be a temporary scheme and that the size of potential losses be small relative to the total liabilities. Eurostat noted that the Minister for Finance will examine at the end of 2012 whether NAMA has met its objectives and decide if its continuation is justified. It suggested that a detailed analysis has to be carried out, especially of the guarantee arrangements. It made no judgement on the draft NAMA business plan but stated that the presence of market investors is reassuring to it (those providing 51% of the equity in the SPV). Their preliminary conclusion is that the Master SPV may be classified as a financial corporation. However, this is a preliminary view and is subject to revision.

NAMA's private investors[edit]

The three investors owning 51% of the SPV were revealed by the Minister of Finance in April 2010, and in NAMA's June 2010 business plan:

Irish Life Investment Managers, a part of Permanent TSB;

New Ireland Assurance, a part of Bank of Ireland;

Clients of Allied Irish Banks Investment Managers, a part of Allied Irish Banks

Each provided €17m for a total of €51m of NAMA's initial capital of €100m. NAMA then geared up way above typical EU banking limits, taking on debt 35 times its paid-up capital. The reason given for this is that the loans are temporary; they have bought other loans at a discount (see below); will be repaid on property sales; and are subject to continuous review. They are similar in function to bridging loans.[23][24]

The purpose of NAMA's quasi-independent legal status is to remove its debts from general Irish government debt. This is the position of the government, the International Monetary Fund and Eurostat.

But, as the three private investors are bank-run pension fund managers, whose parent or major-shareholder companies had been all but nationalised by 2011, and as the 2010 Credit Institutions (Stabilisation) Act allows the government powers to apply to the courts to restructure any financial body in any way in secret at any time, and as a general guarantee to protect the parent banks remains in place (see the covered institutions below), the international rating agencies consider NAMA's debts to be a part of Irish government debt.[25] Besides, NAMA's directors on the SPV board "will maintain a veto over all decisions of the Board that could affect the interests of NAMA or of the Irish government."[26]

Sale of AIB and Irish Life Investment Managers' stakes[edit]

Following the acquisition of Allied Irish Banks by the Irish government the SPV stakeholding was sold to South African investor Prestige. In April 2012, the stakeholding in the SPV belonging to Irish Life Investment Managers was sold on the order of the minister for finance, Michael Noonan, to an undisclosed investor. These sales are necessitated by each nationalisation raising the government's stake from a minority 49 percent to a majority to 66 percent.[27]

Timetable[edit]

The National Treasury Management Agency published details on NAMA in a press release dated 8 April 2009.[28] The draft bill was published on 30 July 2009 for public consultation.[29] Following the consultation process, the National Asset Management Agency (NAMA) Bill 2009 was published on 10 September 2009.[30] The bill was debated in the Dáil and Seanad, and passed, on 15 October 2009 by 77 votes to 73.[31] The committee stage of the bill started on 22 October 2009.[32] Following the passing of the bill in both houses of the Oireachtas, President Mary McAleese decided to sign the bill into law on 22 November 2009, despite calls from the Labour Party to seek advice from the Council of State regarding its constitutionality.[33][34]

Defining "long-term economic value"[edit]

The assets will be taken on at a discount, referred to as a haircut, estimated at 30% of book value, and in exchange the banks will be given bonds to sell to raise cash. The 30% discount to the €77bn book value outlined by NAMA includes circa €9bn of unpaid interest. The current value of the assets will not be based on their estimated market value, but on a higher notional "long-term economic value". This higher value is ultimately based on the share prices of Irish banks, which were low in March 2009 but have risen since.

Critics say that this is a circular argument; were the expected discount 50% or more, the banks' share prices would have collapsed. In early September 2009 Minister Lenihan pointed to this rise in share prices as positive news: "... markets have assessed that information in the context of their current share price and rating agencies have used it in their assessment of these institutions." Should an independent NAMA valuation be too low, Lenihan said: "I can give directions to NAMA to have a valuation reconsidered."[35]

In addition, critics also pointed out that the use of the term, often capitalised, Long Term Economic Value which was popular in the press around the time of the establishment of NAMA, often as the acronym LTEV, gave the impression that it was a well-known or accepted term in economics. It was pointed out that, in fact, the acronym did not appear on any internet page before 2009, with the full term appearing only shortly before, with the concept of LTEV being invented primarily to give political cover for paying from taxpayers' funds, a price in excess of the market value of assets.[36]

Problems relating to paying the notional long-term economic value (rather than market value) for the loans to be transferred to NAMA were highlighted by the difficulties of Liam Carroll's Zoe Developments. In July 2009, Zoe Developments, a large property development company, made an application to court seeking the appointment of an examiner. The appointment of an examiner would have allowed it protection from its creditors.[37] Zoe Developments was estimated to have €1.2bn of loans with a likely deficit of €900m in a liquidation scenario. The €1.2bn of loans included debts of €489m to AIB and €113m to Bank of Ireland. In addition to Zoe Developments, Carroll's overall liabilities, including other businesses are estimated to total €2.8bn.[38] On 10 September 2009, High Court judge Frank Clarke refused to appoint an examiner to Zoe Developments despite the support of AIB and Bank of Ireland for such an appointment.[39] Receivers have been appointed after a Supreme Court appeal failed. A deficit of €900m versus loans of €1.2bn if realised would imply a market value of 25% of loan value for Zoe Developments.[40]

On 9 September 2009, economist Philip Lane of Trinity College Dublin published a paper on Estimating Long Term Economic Value.[41] Using economic theory and formulae, Lane describes the long-term economic value being a function of both nominal price levels and the real (inflation-adjusted) economic value of property. The real economic value of property is further defined as a function of numerous factors including, but not limited to: real disposable income per capita; the level of long-term interest rates; the size of the population, and; the demographic structure of the population. On implementation of long-term economic value, Lane highlights the concerns over price levels. In particular, given the debate on domestic competitiveness versus other countries, Ireland may experience real-exchange rate depreciation, which could have a drag effect of nominal property value. He said, "it is important that the NAMA process to recognise the inevitability of such uncertainty in the determining of long-term economic values". As a result, he favours a two-part payment system.

In his speech to the Dáil on 16 September 2009, the Minister of Finance Brian Lenihan indicated that alternatives to NAMA that did not use long-term economic value would lead to the need for fresh equity to be injected by the government into the financial sector of between €4 and 7 billion.[42] Coincidentally, the upper end of this figures is equal to the difference between the €54 billion estimated "long-term economic value" and the €47 billion "current market value". Lenihan noted that the additional €4-7 billion would be an incremental investment in the banks rather than a higher payment for the loans.

Academic and political criticism[edit]

The agency has been the subject of major criticism in both politics and academia. At the time of its establishment, then-Fine Gael Enterprise, Trade and Employment spokesperson, Leo Varadkar, said of NAMA: "(Fianna Fáil and government minister) Willie O'Dea and Peter Bacon, the architect of NAMA, both accept that this is a massive gamble. Taxpayers are right to ask why Fianna Fáil is so keen to gamble with their money without asking the banks, bondholders and institutional investors to take their fair share of the pain. In dealing with the banking crisis, the objective must be to minimise the risk to taxpayers and to get credit flowing to businesses and homebuyers. NAMA achieves neither of these objectives. It won't get credit flowing and it exposes taxpayers to all of the risk." Fine Gael instead proposed a 'national recovery bank'.[43]

Then-Labour Party Enterprise spokesperson and former Finance Minister Ruairi Quinn accused the Government of "proposing to establish the biggest property company in the world and asking taxpayers to foot the bill and bear all the risk." He stated that "this Bill will be one of the most important pieces of legislation ever to have come before Dáil Éireann. There will be enormous consequences for the taxpayer if the government get it wrong." Labour instead has proposed the temporary nationalisation of the banks.[44]

A commentary signed by leading academics also questioned the NAMA strategy. They wrote in The Irish Times that they saw

...nationalisation as being the inevitable consequence of a required recapitalisation of the banks done on terms that are fair for the taxpayer.

We can summarise our arguments in favour of nationalisation, and against the Government's current approach of limited recapitalisation and the introduction of an asset management agency, under four headings. We consider that nationalisation will better protect taxpayers' interests, produce a more efficient and longer lasting solution to our banking problems, be more transparent in relation to pricing of distressed assets, and be far more likely to produce a banking system free from the toxic reputation that our current financial institutions have deservedly earned.[45]

The criticisms were disputed by the Government. Then-Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment Mary Coughlan defended the creation of the agency saying it was not a bailout for the banks, one of the charges made against it.[15]

On 7 October 2009, Professor Joseph Stiglitz, winner of the Nobel Prize in economics and former chief economist of the World Bank, speaking at Trinity College Dublin criticised NAMA.[46] He said, "Countries which allow banks to go under by following the ordinary rules of capitalism have done fine. The US has let 100 banks go this year alone, as did Sweden and Norway in their crises." As well as commenting that in Ireland, "this bank bailout is a simple transfer from taxpayers to bondholders, and it will saddle generations to come. The only thing that might give you solace is that, as chief economist of the World Bank, we see this type of thing happening in banana republics all over the world. Whenever a banking crisis happens, the financial sector uses the turmoil as a mechanism to transfer wealth from the general population to themselves. I've been very disappointed to see that it has happened, not only in banana republics, but in advanced industrialised countries."

On 21 October 2009, ahead of the International Financial Services Summit (IFSS) in Dublin on 5 November 2009, two leading economists expressed caution on NAMA.[47] Professor Nouriel Roubini, Professor at New York University Stern School of Business said that: It is essential that the bad assets are taken off the balance sheets of the financial institutions and that the Government separates the good assets from the bad assets to

clean up the financial system.... But if it does it in such a way that implies it is buying these assets at overpriced prices that does not reflect the underlying value, then it is giving a big subsidy to the bank shareholders and the unsecured creditors." Professor Willem Buiter, Professor of political economy at the London School of Economics and former member of the UK Monetary Policy Committee, said: the Irish Government should have, in principle, gone for a good bank, not a bad bank.... The bad bank is always a bad idea because it means that the Government underwrites all the creditors and creates moral hazard." Other participants at the IFSS include Martin Wolf, Chief Economics Commentator, Financial Times and Philip Lane, Professor of International Macroeconomics at Trinity College Dublin.

In February 2010 Brian Cowen defended his claim that the NAMA would increase the supply of credit into the economy despite the International Monetary Fund (IMF) saying it would not lead to any significant increase. "People should contemplate what level of credit accessibility we'd have in this economy without NAMA," he said. "It's not just sufficient in itself obviously for credit flow, it's certainly an important and necessary part of restructuring our banking system, of that there's no doubt, in terms of improving as a location for funding of banking operations," said Mr Cowen. He previously said that the Government's objective in restructuring the banks through NAMA was to "generate more access to credit for Irish business at this critical time". In September 2009, Lenihan expressed a similar view, saying it would lead to more lending for business and households. Cowen was responding to reports published on 8 February that the IMF had told Lenihan in April 2009 that the NAMA would not lead to a significant increase in lending by the banks.[48]

The comments, which appear in internal Department of Finance documents released under the Freedom of Information Act, were made by senior IMF official Steven Seelig who joined the board of NAMA in May 2010. Minutes of a private meeting at the department between Brian Lenihan and IMF officials on 29 April 2009 last state that the "IMF (Mr Seelig) do not believe that Nama will result in significant increase in bank lending in Ireland". The Government has maintained that NAMA's purchase of bad loans from the banks with State bonds would increase the flow of credit in the economy since the plan was unveiled April 2009. Speaking at the publication of the NAMA legislation in September 2009, Mr Lenihan said it would "strengthen and improve" the funding positions of the banks "so that they can lend to viable businesses and households". The IMF estimated in their published report the domestic banks would face losses of up to €35 billion, though the department pointed out this would be partly funded from operating profits and provisions already taken against some loan losses.[48]

Supplementary Data and Draft Business Plan[edit]

On 16 September 2009, NAMA published Supplementary Data Document that contained high level statistic on NAMA, data on property yields, and information on the six covered institutions.[49] The supplemental data indicated the book-value of the loans expected to be transferred to NAMA by the six covered institutions (Bank of Ireland, Allied Irish Banks, Anglo Irish Bank, EBS, Permanent TSB, Irish Nationwide) was €68bn. The suggested transfer value was €54bn, with the estimated market value at €47bn.

In addition to the supplementary data document, the Department of Finance published incremental data on 13 October 2009 in a Draft NAMA Business Plan.[50]

Total€, billion

Assets value at origination

Approximate average LTV

77%

Net Original Balance excluding Interest roll up

Potential decline in property prices approximate estimate

47%

Estimated current market value of underlying asset

Interest Roll up Estimate

Potential total book value for transfer to NAMA

Haircut on loans

30%

Price NAMA could pay for loans

Within the Supplementary Data Document there is data on the financial ratios of the six covered banks. Adding up the Tier 1 capital of the six covered institutions, as reported in the Supplemental Data document leads to total Tier 1 capital of €29bn. This compares to combined risk-weighted-assets of €363bn, and a Tier 1 capital ratio of 7.9%. Basel II recommends a minimum ratio of 4% capital requirement.

Institution

Date of report

Risk-weighted assets, € million

Tier 1 Capital€, million

Tier 1 ratio

Allied Irish Banks

30 June 2009

131,327

10,249

7.8%

Bank of Ireland

31 March 2009

105,377

11,026

10.5%

Anglo Irish Bank

31 March 2009

80,175

3,120

3.9%

Permanent TSB

30 June 2009

21,619

2,006

9.3%

Irish Nationwide

31 December 2008

14,825

1,394

9.4%

EBS

30 June 2009

9,984

769

7.7%

Total

363,307

28,564

7.9%

According to the Supplementary Data Document, the long-term-economic value of the loans transferred to NAMA was 15% higher than the market value. NAMA applied statutory adjustment factors to estimate the valuation of €54bn. The document also noted that asset prices would need to increase from current market values by 10%, for the government and taxpayers to avoid any loss, taking into account subordinated debt. The difference between the 15% uplift to get to €54bn and the need for a 10% uplift for the taxpayer to avoid a loss, was explained in the Draft NAMA Business Plan. This analysis took into account the expected part payment in subordinate debt to the six covered institutions of €2.7bn (circa 5% of the €54bn transfer value). This subordinated debt holders may receive none of the proceeds in a scenario where the taxpayers are exposed to a loss.

Market response[edit]

On Thursday 17 September 2009, the day after the estimated cost of NAMA was announced, shares in AIB and Bank of Ireland rose in value. On the ISEQ Index, shares in AIB rose by 30% and shares in Bank of Ireland rose by 17%. Shares for both banks were also up on the U.S. stock markets.

Analysis of the data[edit]

Based on the information presented in the Supplementary Data Document, if the €68bn book value was transferred at €54bn to NAMA, the covered institutions could be a write-down of both their Tier 1 capital and Risk-weighted assets of €14bn in aggregate. Assuming a 1-for-1 write-down of €14bn in the risk weighted assets and the same of the Tier 1 capital, the new ratio would be 4.2% with risk weighted assets of €349bn and Tier 1 capital of €15bn.

Assuming the transfer value was at the market-value estimate of €47bn, not €54bn, then Tier 1 capital could fall by €21bn not €14bn. Risk weighted assets could be €342bn and Tier 1 capital €8bn, with a ratio of 2.2%.

Risk-Weighted-Assets€, billion

Tier 1 Capital€, billion

Tier 1 ratio

Aggregate, 6 Covered Institutions

363

7.9%

Suggested Transfer Value to NAMA

Estimated Book Value

Potential Write-Down

-14

Aggregate, 6 Covered Institutions, Adjusted

349

4.2%

Additional Right if use Estimated Market Value of €47 billion

-7

Aggregate, 6 Covered Institutions, Adjusted

342

2.2%

However, this analysis looks at the aggregate data provided in the Supplemental Data Document. For a clearer picture, NAMA would need to give a breakdown of the loans to be transferred, by institution, as well as the book value and market value of each. Some additional information was provided on 13 October 2009 in the Draft NAMA Business Plan, indicates that the six covered institutions have taken €7bn of provisions in the last year against loan impairments and giving the split of the €77bn of prospective loans for transfer to NAMA. However, the data point of the current net book value of the loan portfolios and the prospective transfer price for the portfolios by each of the 6 covered institutions was omitted.

Transfer of derivatives portfolio to NAMA[edit]

In addition to the potential loan book transfer to NAMA, the Draft NAMA Business Plan outlined the existence of over 1,000 derivative positions attached to the commercial loans. These loans were transferred to NAMA as well. The nominal value of this derivative portfolio was €14.7 billion. Developers and other borrowers in real-estate transactions are often required by lenders to enter into derivative transactions as part of a loan agreement, as a mechanism to fix the interest rate on the loan. Typically, interest rate swap agreements are used. If interest rates fall, the borrower does not benefit, as he/she must pay the saving to the counter-party of the swap agreement. Given the decline in interest rates over the last 2 years (e.g. the US Federal Funds Rate was 0.25% in late September 2009 versus 5.25% in August 2007), there may be a significant liability relating to the €14.7bn derivative portfolio. The Draft NAMA Business Plan does not elaborate on the magnitude of this liability, however, it states: "These derivatives change the interest rate structure of the underlying loans and their mark-to-market value will be incorporated into the valuation of the loans".

Post transfer[edit]

The information provided in the Supplementary Data Document also included analysis of the total loan books of the covered institutions. In particular it identified, €27bn of watch loans (low quality), €31bn of vulnerable loans (past due) and €29bn of impaired loans. That was a total of €86bn of loans, at net book value. This was in excess of the loans expected to be transferred to NAMA. Following the potential transfer of loans with a book value of €68bn to NAMA, the six covered institutions would still have an aggregate of €18bn of loans that were watch loans, vulnerable, and/or impaired. This exceeded the €15bn of Tier 1 Capital within the six banks, after the NAMA transfer.

Institution

Date of report

Net loan book€, million

Watch loans / lower quality loans€, million

Vulnerable loans / past due loans€, million

Impaired loans€, million

Allied Irish Banks

31 December 2009

130,000

12,120

8,604

17,453

Bank of Ireland

31 December 2009

134,700

3,300

5,400

13,400

Anglo Irish Bank

31 December 2009

72,100

6,200

8,700

34,600

Permanent TSB

31 December 2009

38,639

2,877

3,208

828

Irish Nationwide

31 December 2009

11,132

1,721

6,464

EBS

30 June 2009

17,035

603

697

407

Total

403,606

26,821

26,609

73,152

The Draft NAMA Business Plan indicated that the potential loans for transfer to NAMA of €77bn book value (including rolled-up interest) was divided into €24.1 billion from AIB, €28.4 billion from Anglo-Irish Bank, €15.5 billion from Bank of Ireland, €0.8 billion from EBS, and €8.3 billion from Irish Nationwide.

The document stated "that about 40% of the loans are estimated to be cash-generating". This indicated that €46 billion of the loans were not paying interest. Of the €31 billion that were cash-generating, there was no indication in the document if they were paying the full requirements under the terms of the loan agreements. The €31 billion was divided into €28 billion of commercial loans and €3 billion of land and development loans. This compared to a breakdown of the €77 billion of €28 billion of commercial loans, €21 billion of land and development loans, and €28 billion of associated loans.

Additional data on the size of the underlying loans was also provided in the Draft Business Plan. Of particular note was that the 10 largest underlying loans had a projected book value of €16 billion (i.e. 20% of the overall €77 billion), with an average loan size of €1.6 billion each. The top 100 underlying loans totalled €38 billion, equivalent to 49% of the overall.

In July 2010 after the a revised business plan was published it was revealed that it was then predicting a possible profit of €1bn, with the possibility of losses of up to €800m, after an initially projection of more than €4bn in profit. The plan published then updated and revised the interim business plan published in October of the previous year which was prepared on the basis of information supplied at that time by the five participating institutions (Anglo Irish Bank, AIB, Bank of Ireland, EBS and Irish Nationwide) and in advance of the detailed examination of any of the key loans by NAMA. Then-Finance Minister Brian Lenihan denied that the Government got its sums wrong on NAMA.[51]

The original business plan estimated a profit of €4.8bn based on a rise in assets value of 10%. The revised figures said that if they recovered the full value of the loans plus 10% it would result in a profit of €3.9bn.

NAMA chairman Frank Daly said the plan confirmed that the five institutions covered by NAMA had not disclosed or had been unaware of the extent of the financial crisis afflicting their borrowers. He said the banks had shown 'remarkable generosity' towards their borrowers, adding that NAMA had no intention of maintaining that approach. 'To say the least we are extremely disappointed and disturbed to find that, only months after being led to believe that 40% of loans were income producing, the real figure is actually 25%.

Raising new equity capital[edit]

If there are further substantial write-downs within the Irish banking industry post-NAMA this could lead to further financial difficulties. Patrick Honohan, a professor of International Financial Economics and Development at Trinity College Dublin, and shortly afterwards to be appointed head of the Central Bank of Ireland, stated on 21 July 2009 that "Unless the loans are valued at unrealistically high prices, the NAMA process will leave the banks with insufficient capital. This is especially true considering the additional loan losses in non-property lending that are inevitable given the depth of the recession and which will have to be provided for."[52] Professor Honohan was appointed Governor of the Central Bank of Ireland and Financial Services Authority by the Minister of Finance in late September 2009.

On 5 October 2009, the Irish Independent reported that European banks needed to raise substantial equity capital, including AIB and BOI.[53] The article quoted a report by the bank JP Morgan which estimated that the AIB and BoI needed to raise a combined €11bn, €7bn for AIB and €4bn for BoI.

On 8 October 2009, Brian Lenihan, then-Minister of Finance, said that even after selling real-estate loans to the government's NAMA, that the country's biggest banks may need further money. Additional funding from the Irish government was highlighted, with Lenihan recognising that it would be difficult to raise funds on the stock market.[54]

On 10 October 2009, the Irish Times reported that Bank of Ireland and AIB could need to raise a combined €9bn as a result of write-downs associated with the transfer of assets to NAMA.[55] The article quotes a Merrion Capital report that estimates that AIB and BoI's equity Tier 1 Capital ratios would fall to 3.3% and 3.5% in 2010/11.

In the Draft NAMA Business Plan published on 13 October 2009, it stated that: "After the transfer of their L&D and associated loans to NAMA, it is likely that some institutions will require additional capital in order to absorb the consequent write-downs on the book value of their assets. The Government indicated that it expected institutions to seek private sector capital in the first place but to the extent that sufficient capital cannot be raised independently or generated internally, it remained committed to providing institutions with an appropriate level of capital to continue to meet their requirement."

Capital from a debt-for-equity swap[edit]

The August 2009 open letter by 46 academics[56] reported in the Irish Times, suggests that the Government is in a strong position, if it chooses, to negotiate with bondholders to engage in some debt for equity swaps. The information provided in the Supplementary Data Document shows an aggregate of €20bn of sub-ordinate debt at the six covered institutions. Assuming all or part of this sub-ordinate debt is converted into equity could play a role in improving the Tier 1 ratio of the industry.

The concept of subordinated debt holders receiving no return on their loans, is raised in the Draft NAMA Business Plan, where the subordinated debt issued to the covered institutions, could receive nothing in a scenario where the Irish taxpayer incurs a loss on its investment in NAMA. 5% of the €54 billion purchase price is forecast to be paid in sub-ordinated loans.

The Draft Business Plan[edit]

The Draft Business plan assumed a life of 11 years for NAMA from 2010 to 2020 with full repayment of the €54 billion loans issued by NAMA/Irish Government by the end of 2020. Cumulative interest on the loans is forecast at €16 billion, using the forward Swap rate for the euro. Given a percentage of the loans are cash-generative this €16 billion may be partially offset by an estimated €12 billion of interest received. The Draft business plan expects a default rate of 20% on the €77 billion of principal, and repayment of €62 billion. The €15 billion of defaulted loans is forecast to be sold for €4 billion (i.e. circa 27% of loan value). Fees and running costs of NAMA are estimated at €240m per annum, i.e. circa €3 billion over 11 years. Taking all of these cash-flows together leads to a cumulative positive cash flow of €5 billion.

The Draft Business Plan looks at sensitivity analysis, indicating that if short and/or long-term interest rates rise, there would be an erosion of the €5 billion positive cash flow to NAMA. Similarly, if the default rate increases, this cash flow would be eroded. The document states that an increase of the default rate to 31% would erode in full the net present value of the positive cash flow.

The Draft Business Plan does not attempt to match the €62 billion of principal repayments and €4 billion of asset recovery (of the estimated €15 billion of defaulting loans) to the €54 billion "long-term-economic value" expected to be paid for the NAMA loan portfolio. Nor is there any analysis comparing the forecast €15 billion of defaults relative to the estimates 60% of loans, i.e. €46 billion, that are not cash-generative.

A part of the Draft Business Plan that is mentioned but not modeled in the document, is the ability of the NAMA to borrow an incremental €5 billion to pursue its "asset development/enhancement objectives". In particular, NAMA may invest in projects that are deemed commercially viable. NAMA shall inherit with the loans, undrawn commitments of €6.5bn to the borrowers.

Risk-sharing v ex post levy[edit]

This section needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources in this section. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (February 2023) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)

On 6 May 2009, Professor Honohan, presented his views on NAMA to a committee of the Irish parliament.[57] In particular, he raised the idea of a two-part payment to the banks, part debt & part equity, as a mechanism to reduce the risk to the taxpayer of overpaying for the loans. He specifically identified this mechanism as being superior to an ex-post levy on the banks. An additional advantage of paying part-equity for the loans, that Professor Honohan mentions in his paper of 6 May 2009, is the benefit of having some private shareholders within NAMA, given "the extensive international evidence showing that Government-owned banking systems serve their economies poorly."

On 9 October 2009, the two parties of the Irish government at the time, Fianna Fáil and the Green Party agreed a "Renewed Programme for Government". In this agreement, it stated "Should NAMA make a loss over time, a levy would be imposed to recoup the cost to taxpayers".[58] This proposal is not in line with the preferred option that Professor Honohan highlighted in May 2009.

In the letter from Eurostat to the CSO dated 16 October 2009, it is noted that in addition to the 5% of the purchase price paid in subordinate bonds, that reduces the potential losses of the Irish taxpayer, that an amendment to the legislation that shall be introduced means that the participating banks shall have to pay a tax surcharge on their operating profits until the loss of the Master SPV, related to NAMA, is recouped.

Operations in 2010-11[edit]

NAMA published its 2010 accounts and summarised its more recent achievements in July 2011. In round figures it had acquired loans of €72 billion for €30 billion. To buy these it had issued bonds worth €30 billion that buyers could sell to the European Central Bank (ECB). The banks' losses of €42 billion written off on these sales, and their other losses, were met by Irish government cash or loans that were advanced or ultimately guaranteed by the ECB. €3.9 billion-worth of sales both in and outside Ireland had been approved by NAMA in a difficult market, given the scale of the Great Recession.[59][60]

In that the main purpose of NAMA was to remove bad debts from the six banks and to recapitalize them, it was hard to see how it had made a difference in the short term. The plan relied upon an early worldwide recovery from recession, which did not occur. Government support for the banks continued separately from NAMA and had risen to 32% of GDP by September 2010.

In turn, the government's support for NAMA itself was quantified in July 2010 by the IMF as "more than 25% of GDP in 2010".[61] The financial markets concluded that Ireland could not support the cost of the banks as well as NAMA, and run a budget deficit, and they sold Irish bonds at the time of the renewal of the two-year state bank guarantee in September 2010, causing yields to rise. It became impossible for the government itself to borrow from the bond markets. The drop in value of Irish bonds also had an immediate effect on the balance sheets of Irish and foreign banks' capital requirements.

As a result, in November 2010 the Irish government was itself obliged to seek a €67 billion net "bailout" from the ECB and IMF and undertook in return that the sale of the six banks' remaining assets outside NAMA would be "expedited"; part of the money was to cover future losses incurred by buyers of those assets. By early 2011 the six banks' liquidity needs were being supported by a further €150 billion from the ECB.[62] Despite all the efforts to save them, in April 2011 the six banks' credit ratings were reduced to junk status by Moody's.[63]

Recent developments[edit]

In February 2011, the Supreme Court delivered judgment in an appeal taken by Paddy McKillen against a purported decision to acquire loans taken out by Mr. McKillen and companies controlled by him. The court found that the decision had been taken by a group of senior managers before NAMA had been formed and accordingly there was no decision of NAMA to acquire the loans.[64]

In April 2011 NAMA announced that it would commence selling home mortgages to private investors on the basis that the investor pays equity of 30% of the asking price of the loan, with NAMA providing financing for the balance.[65]

Status as a public authority[edit]

Following an appeal from journalist Gavin Sheridan the Irish Office of the Commissioner for Environmental Information determined in September 2011 that NAMA was a public authority for the purposes of the Access to Information on the Environment (AIE) Regulations 2007, and was therefore obliged to answer AIE requests from applicants.[66] The Regulations in question were the Irish transposition of European Directive 2003/4/EC, an implementation of one element of the Aarhus Convention into EU law.

NAMA disagreed with this decision and appealed to the High Court on a point of law. In February 2013 High Court judge Colm Mac Eochaidh ruled in favour of the Commissioner for Environmental Information.[67] The case centred on the statutory interpretation of the term "and includes" in Irish law. The case cost a total of €121,350 to the Irish taxpayer up to that point.[68]

NAMA appealed the High Court's decision to the Supreme Court, and the case was first heard on 7 April 2014 before Chief Justice Susan Denham, Mr Justice Murray, Mr Justice Hardiman, Mr Justice O'Donnell and Ms Justice Dunne. On 23 June 2015 the Supreme Court dismissed NAMA's appeal and ruled that it was in fact subject to the AIE Regulations.[69] The court relied on an earlier ruling of the European Court of Justice in Fish Legal, where the court ruled that, "entities which, organically, are administrative authorities, namely those which form part of the public administration or the executive of the State at whatever level, are public authorities for the purposes of Article 2(2)(a) of Directive 2003/4. This first category includes all legal persons governed by public law which have been set up by the State and which it alone can decide to dissolve".[70]

Geoghegan Review[edit]

In December 2011 the Agency published the Geoghegan Review, a report on NAMA's functional organisation, skills and delegation arrangements produced by the former Group Chief Executive of HSBC Holdings Plc, Michael Geoghegan. The Review includes a number of non-binding recommendations for the Agency's Board, including the need to be more entrepreneurial in focus and proposing a greater delegation of authorities from the Board to the Executive.[71]

In February 2012, Paddy McKillen won the latest hearing on a preliminary issue in his UK legal battle with the Barclay brothers for control of the five-star Maybourne Hotel Group in London. The latest ruling strengthens his case against the Barclays to argue that Ireland's National Asset Management Agency unlawfully transferred €800 million of debt on the hotels to the brothers last September.[72]

NAMA to Nature[edit]

In March 2012 a group called NAMA to Nature began planting trees on NAMA sites in a symbolic protest against the failure of the government agency to address the enduring presence of ghost estates and the failure of developers to clear unfinished construction sites. This action was reported in thejournal.ie.[73] It was also reported in the Irish Times.[74] Two of the participants were interviewed on The John Murray Radio Show[75]

Northern Ireland loan sale[edit]

In early April 2014, NAMA sold a portfolio of Northern Ireland loans for £4.5bn (€5.4bn). The deal brokered was NAMA's single biggest transaction to date and followed an extensive sales process involving bidders from both the US and Europe. The loan book (aka Project Eagle) included a portfolio of various commercial properties in the North.

It was reported to have been initially acquired by NAMA for £1bn (€1.2bn).[76]

The Northern Ireland Assembly's Committee for Finance and Personnel launched an inquiry into the sale[77] after concerns were raised by Mick Wallace TD in the Dáil. The inquiry, led by Daithí McKay MLA, uncovered the fact that a meeting took place between DUP Ministers and potential bidders for the portfolio.[78]

"Project Albion" portfolio sale[edit]

In 2015, under "Project Albion", NAMA sold a portfolio of United Kingdom commercial assets to Oaktree Capital Management for £115m that had had a book value of £226m.[79]

Section 110 tax avoidance[edit]

See also: Irish Section 110 Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV)

In June 2016 Irish media outlets started noting that US distressed debt funds (known by the pejorative term "vulture funds") were filing Irish company accounts with large profits on their Irish investments (bought from NAMA) but no Irish tax payments.[80][81][82][83][84] They could see the equity of these companies was "owned" by Irish registered Charities[85] some of which were run by IFSC law firms.[86]

It emerged these US "vulture funds" were using orphaned Section 110 SPVs (discovered because most Irish SPVs must file public accounts), structured by IFSC law and accounting firms,[87] to export untaxed income and capital gains earned on domestic Irish assets to offshore locations (via the PPN interest payments) such as the Cayman Islands.[88][89]

Stephen Donnelly TD called for a Dáil investigation and produced detailed calculations[90] based on the scale of asset disposals by NAMA to US funds showing that the loss of Irish taxes could reach €20bn.[91][92][93] The affair escalated during 2016 and was covered in the international media[94][95] and in several Irish RTÉ Prime Time Investigates programs.

There was confusion when Dáil deputy Stephen Donnelly asked whether NAMA had knowingly sold assets to bidders with Section 110 SPVs. However, in later disclosures, Finance Minister Noonan stated that NAMA were users of the Section 110 SPVs, and would incur a €158m tax charge as a result of changes Noonan made to Section 110 legislation in the 2016 Finance Act.[96]

The affair focused Irish public attention on the scale and speed at which funds had profited from NAMA sales, and led to some concern that NAMA had sold too quickly (and on a tax-free basis).[97][98]

Garrett Kelleher Litigation[edit]

NAMA is the subject of US$1.2 billion lawsuit from former Irish property developer, Garrett Kelleher.[99] The case, formally brought by Kelleher's company, Shelbourne North Water Street Corporation, concerns the financial collapse of Kelleher's 'Chicago Spire' development in Chicago, Illinois, USA; and seeks damages of $1.2bn against Nama, alleging that the agency destroyed the developer's chances of building the Chicago Spire through a combination of "sheer spite" and "consistent incompetence". The case, if it reaches court, would be the first time NAMA has faced a jury trial. The case is just one of a number of lawsuits Kelleher has brought, not always successfully, against NAMA.[100]

tokenpocketapp官方地址|nama

tokenpocketapp官方地址|nama

Nama Cold Press Juicer | Nurture Wellness Rituals

Just a moment...

Nama J2 Cold Press Juicer

WELCOME TO NAMA - NAMA

Nama people - Wikipedia

WTO | Market access - Non-agricultural market access negotiations - A simple guide

NAMA FOUNDATION - NAMA

Shop Nama Cold Press Juicer Models

National Asset Management Agency - Wikipedia

菜单

支持

Follow

tokenpocketapp官方地址|nama

tokenpocketapp官方地址|nama

Nama Cold Press Juicer | Nurture Wellness Rituals

Just a moment...

Nama J2 Cold Press Juicer

WELCOME TO NAMA - NAMA

Nama people - Wikipedia

WTO | Market access - Non-agricultural market access negotiations - A simple guide

NAMA FOUNDATION - NAMA

Shop Nama Cold Press Juicer Models

National Asset Management Agency - Wikipedia

最近的新闻

您可能喜欢的文章

tokenpocketapp官方链接|academy

比特派钱包手机版app下载|chemistry

比特派安卓版钱包怎么用

比特派登录不上怎么办

比特派检测到异常怎么回事

比特派不让验证怎么办呢

比特派持有人姓名怎么修改